Friday, August 11, 2017

Full-Time Officials?

It's finally happened. The NFL and the NFL Referees Association have agreed to make some officials full-time employees of the league. The following from ESPN's Kevin Seifert explains the situation and what we can expect.

Hold up. NFL officials weren't already full-time?
Nope.
How could that be?
The current structure is a vestige of an otherwise forgotten era when almost everyone in the game -- including players and coaches -- were seasonal employees who had other jobs in the offseason. To this day, the NFL's 124 officials work on a contractor basis. They are paid well, but most of them have "day" jobs during the week and throughout the offseason.
Some, including referees Walt Anderson and Terry McAulay, are officiating supervisors at the college level. Others have careers entirely unrelated to football. They are attorneys -- including referees Ed Hochuli, Ronald Torbert and Clete Blakeman -- as well as insurance agents, high school principals and financial advisors.
What's the problem with that? Officials work one game per week for less than half the year.
This is where the issue gets sticky. Not everyone thinks that converting officials to full-time status would, by definition, improve their performance in games. It's not as if they'll be able to officiate more games, and thus get more "practice," if they are full-time. In March, NFLRA executive director Scott Green said it is a "complete misnomer" to suggest that officials weren't already full-time, in terms of time commitment relative to the job requirements.
Preach ...
It appears the NFL has been more focused on finding common ground for the process of conversion, and the requirement of full-time status, than the details of what would come next. In a news release, the league wrote that the implementation of the program will "provide the NFL officiating department, in consultation with the NFLRA, the opportunity to identify the most effective ways to utilize the off-field time for game officials throughout the calendar year."
In other words, we'll see what the best and brightest will come up with.
Pretty much.
But somebody must have really wanted this.
Oh, without question. It's simple in theory. How can the NFL claim to be officiating its games as well as possible if its officials spend most of their professional time in unrelated pursuits? New Orleans Saints coach Sean Payton called the situation "madness" last year, reflecting the growing objections from coaches, players and fans to non-full time status.
So are you saying this is a semantic change for appearances' sake?
Not really. Ultimately, this shift can improve officiating. But it might not be reflected in terms of on-field accuracy, which is actually quite good on a per-call basis. You'll more likely see it manifested in off-field arenas, such as the development of rules that are more easily officiated, via offseason working groups and discussion among full-time officials who otherwise wouldn't have had time or the organization to dive into such matters.
It also stands to reason that full-time officials can be in the league's New York offices on a regular basis. There is no substitute for in-person communication on issues that arise.
What do officials think of this?
The reality is that they agreed to the possibility in 2012, when the most recent collective bargaining agreement between the NFL and NFRA was reached. But the league had never approached the NFLRA with a structure that would entice officials to change their career aspirations. Financial details weren't immediately available, but both sides must feel confident that there is proper incentive for at least 10 percent of the current officials to be interested.
This is targeted only at referees, right?
No. Any of the league's 124 active officials can apply. Former vice president of officiating Mike Pereira once endorsed a plan to make the league's 17 referees full time, but Green and the NFLRA insisted on opportunity for all.
Pereira's thinking was that the referee, as the crew chief, would provide maximum value to the full-time program. Green, however, said that a blended group would maximize knowledge and experience.
So how will this work?
Beginning immediately, any of the 124 current officials can apply for full-time status. They will be allowed to work outside of the league, according to the agreement, but their NFL duties must be given top priority.
"It is definitely a priority shift," Green said. "The NFL will have to be their priority employer. But there is no restriction other than 'be available,' and ultimately the NFL will decide if you're able to do that."
Will the full-time officials have to move or commute to New York?
No, but they will be required to travel to meetings on 48 hours' notice.
Can the NFL require an official of interest to accept full-time status as a requirement for continued employment?
No. The application process means that it cannot be made compulsory.
Is this change permanent?
Actually, no. The sides amended the CBA to reflect the details of the program, but it is technically a one-year experiment that would have to be renewed in order to proceed beyond June of 2018.
Why would an official take the plunge without a guarantee it will last beyond one year?
Some officials are retired or semi-retired from their current job. Some feel confident they can keep their side work while prioritizing the NFL. Remember the cap at this point is 24, which is only 10 percent of the current roster. Advanced math suggests that 90 percent of officials in 2017 won't be full-time.
Anything else, smart guy?
That'll about do it, for now ...
***

So, we are finally getting some full-time officials on NFL fields. It's a good thing. The full-time officials will be involved in the offseason rule-making process. They'll be at meetings for the competition committee, the general manager's advisory committee, coach's subcommittee, and the player safety advisory panel. They'll be doing official-stuff year-round. All of this should improve communication. Most importantly it should improve the consistency in the refereeing on the field. If it improves the officiating at all it's a very good thing. The only bad thing that I can imagine is the potential for issues between the full-time officials and those that aren't full-time. A teacher's pet sort of thing.

No comments:

Post a Comment